Analysing and Extending Well-Founded and Partial Stable Semantics Using Partial Equilibrium Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
In [4] a nonmonotonic formalism called partial equilibrium logic (PEL) was proposed as a logical foundation for the well-founded semantics (WFS) of logic programs. PEL consists in de ning a class of minimal models, called partial equilibrium (p-equilibrium), inside a non-classical logic called HT 2. In [4] it was shown that, on normal logic programs, p-equilibrium models coincide with Przymusinki's partial stable (p-stable) models. This paper begins showing that this coincidence still holds for the more general class of disjunctive programs, so that PEL can be seen as a way to extend WFS and p-stable semantics to arbitrary propositional theories. We also study here the problem of strong equivalence for various subclasses of p-equilibrium models, investigate transformation rules and nonmonotonic inference, and consider a reduction of PEL to equilibrium logic. In addition we examine the behaviour of PEL on nested logic programs and its complexity in the general case.
منابع مشابه
Strong Negation in Well-Founded and Partial Stable Semantics for Logic Programs
A formalism called partial equilibrium logic (PEL) has recently been proposed as a logical foundation for the well-founded semantics (WFS) of logic programs. In PEL one defines a class of minimal models, called partial equilibrium models, in a non-classical logic, HT . On logic programs partial equilibrium models coincide with Przymusinski’s partial stable (p-stable) models, so that PEL can be ...
متن کاملOn the Logic and Computation of Partial Equilibrium Models
The nonmonotonic formalism of partial equilibrium logic (PEL) was introduced and studied in [1,2] and proposed as a logical foundation for the partial stable and well-founded semantics of logic programs. Here we study further logical properties of PEL and some techniques to compute partial equilibrium models.
متن کاملLogical Foundations of Well-Founded Semantics
We propose a solution to a long-standing problem in the foundations of well-founded semantics (WFS) for logic programs. The problem addressed is this: which (non-modal) logic can be considered adequate for well-founded semantics in the sense that its minimal models (appropriately defined) coincide with the partial stable models of a logic program? We approach this problem by identifying the HT ...
متن کاملAbduction in Logic Programming as Second-Order Quantifier Elimination
It is known that skeptical abductive explanations with respect to classical logic can be characterized semantically in a natural way as formulas with second-order quantifiers. Computing explanations is then just elimination of the second-order quantifiers. By using application patterns and generalizations of second-order quantification, like literal projection, the globally weakest sufficient c...
متن کاملA Logic for Reasoning about Well-Founded Semantics: Preliminary Report
The paper presents a preliminary solution to a long-standing problem in the foundations of well-founded semantics for logic programs. The problem addressed is this: which logic can be considered adequate for well-founded semantics (WFS) in the sense that its minimal models (appropriately defined) coincide with the partial stable models of a logic program? We approach this problem by identifying...
متن کامل